Betsy Devos – on topic article

From the start, Betsy DeVos’ position as the US Secretary of Education has been a rocky one. Barely confirmed to her position by a Senate vote of 51-50, her tenure since has been fraught with combat. While DeVos may publicly present a united front with President Donald Trump’s policies, her actual position behind the scenes may be anything but.

 

Controversy and conflict are nothing new to DeVos. The daughter of billionaire businessman Edgar Prince and the wife of the scion of an even wealthier family has been making a name in the political arena for quite some time. A strong advocate of the charter school system, she has fought for nearly three decades in her native state of Michigan to create stronger support for charter schools, while chipping away at support for traditional public schools.

 

While detractors may claim that her support of charter schools is harming a public school system already in chaos, there can be no doubt that she has been widely successful in bolstering charter education in Michigan. Detroit boast the nation’s largest concentration of charter schools, although in some cases, supply actually exceeds demand. Opponents fear she will repeat this victory on a national level in Washington.

 

Already, Ms. DeVos has shown that her opponent’s fears are not without merit. While DeVos stated in her confirmation hearings that nothing was going to change the fact that the vast majority of American students attend public schools, she seemed to have something quite different to say once in office. After visiting a Washington public school, she was quoted as deriding public school teachers by saying they were simply waiting to be told what to do, rather than taking initiative.

 

One DeVos supporter, however, defended her position claiming that she simply understood what most Americans did not: that even the best public schools in the US are still underperforming in contrast to schools in other developed nations. Prominent Michigan Republican Greg McNeilly went on to say that he feels that DeVos simply wants to have a more public conversation with America about focusing more on what should be expected from schools and less on the form the delivery system of education takes.

 

One thing both proponents and opponents of DeVos agree upon, however, is how fiercely determined she is. In addition, while her politics may be staunchly Republican, that doesn’t mean she is always in agreement with President Trump’s policies. In spite of giving no public sign of disagreement with the President’s recent rescinding of a federal policy regarding the use of school bathrooms by transgender students, reports abound that she was not so compliant behind closed doors.

 

In Michigan, she earned a reputation for being a relentless defender of her political beliefs, while still maintaining a publicly gracious image. It seems that one thing all parties can rest assured of is that DeVos is not simply a meek and mild “yes-woman” that will simply get on board with any policies presented to her. While she may not bare her fangs in public, that does not in any way mean she lacks them.

 

Follow Betsy DeVos on Facebook for updates.

The Fortress Investment Group Was Acquired By Softbank

In this article, we are going to discuss the Fortress Investment Group, which is an alternative asset management company. In fact, it’s one of the largest ones in the world. The company has made news after it was acquired. Below is more info about the acquisition, as well as about the company itself.

 

In The News: Softbank Acquires Fortress Investment Group

In February 2017, Softbank Group announced it was going to purchase Fortress Investment Group. The acquisition was worth just over $3.3 billion, but the acquisition wasn’t completed until December of 2017. In the deal, Softbank paid around $8.05 per share for the company. The principals of Fortress agreed that they would stay with the company so they could continue to lead it.

Furthermore, for the most part Fortress acts as a separate company from Softbank. This means Fortress is still able to operate as its own entity/business, and lacrosse camp Fortress Investment Group.

 

About Fortress

Fortress Investment Group is an alternative investment management firm and they operate on a global scale. As of now, the firm managers around $40.3 billion of assets. The company was founded back in 1998, and since then it has grown to an organization that serves over 1,700 private investors and institutional clients. Around 950 asset management workers are employed by Fortress, as well as around 200 investment professionals. The employees are spread across the company’s New York headquarters and their affiliate offices located around the world, and https://www.nasdaq.com/quotes/institutional-portfolio/fortress-investment-group-llc-725821.

 

Core Competencies

The company’s core competencies include being asset-based investing, as well as industry knowledge. The company has extensive knowledge of the industries they invest in. Another competency is operations management. The other two competencies include capital markets and corporate mergers & acquisitions. Fortress takes its core competencies seriously, which clients will realize the moment they start doing business with them.

 

What Do Their Employees Say

You can learn a lot about a company by what their employees say about their employers. Many current and past employees have praised Fortress. One former employee wrote that they worked their for a short time, but they enjoyed it. A current employee mentioned that it was a fast paced company that offers a lot training to their workers, while another employee said the company has a rewarding environment, and contact them.

If anyone wants to do business with Fortress Investment Group, then they can contact the company. They can also visit the alternative investment firm’s website to find out more about their products and services, and more information click here.

Jeremy Goldstein Says the Stocks option is Still Valid

Providing the option of stocks to employees is a way dealing with short-term financial shortcomings for many companies. However, the practice is fast hitting a dead end. According to one of the most experienced advisers on the issues of employee compensation Mr. Jeremy Goldstein. There are three fundamentals that have tilted the playground.

 

 

Using Stocks to Compensate Employees; what’s changing?

 

 

Increased employee awareness is making the option unreliable. Since most modern employees know that stock prices can tumble, it would be hard for companies to convince its workers to take stocks in the place of anticipated compensations. Secondly, the possibility of stock prices slipping so low that the stockholders will be faced with overhang is high. Finally, swapping compensation with stocks generates a complex accounting process that may end up making the option more expensive than the actual material compensation. Nevertheless, Mr. Goldstein maintains that the option of stocks remains useful especially with regard to extra wage payouts, improved insurance and equities.

 

 

What Jeremy Thinks Employers Should Do; In the Wake of Shareholder Activism

 

 

According to Mr. Goldstein, the business world today is filled with shareholder activism. Shareholders are becoming ever more demanding. He points out that it is important for companies to review their schemes for the compensation of employees in order to meet the demands of their shareholders. Jeremy Goldstein gives a raft of options for employers to adjust effectively to the changing market scenarios.

 

 

Control over Payments

 

 

The amount of money that a company decides pay its shareholders can be a bone of contention. If a company’s say on the payment amount is defeated, it may cause mistrust between the company boards and the shareholders. It is, therefore, important to stay ahead of the game by engaging the shareholder’s throughout the year of business. Once the shareholders are fully aware of the facts surrounding payments, it becomes easier to stave off the shareholder activism.

 

 

Stocks, Are They a Good or Bad Compensation Option?

 

 

Goldstein advises that the option of stocks is only helpful to the stockholders if the value of the shares of a corporation rises. If employees are stockholders, they tend to work harder and with greater dedication because they know that they have a stake in the final whole. Furthermore, he notes that the tax burdens may increase if companies choose equity over stocks for their employers. The stocks option is still a great one, nevertheless. Jeremy Goldstein opines that despite the increasing resistance to using stocks as a compensation alternative it is a useful tool as long as a company works proactively to reduce the risk of overhang. He concludes that the risk of prices plunging is overridden by the overall potential benefits to both the employees and the company.

 

 

Summary of Jeremy Goldstein’s Background and Career

 

 

He is an expert in employee compensation and corporate governance. He has engaged with a great number of compensation committees of large organizations to chart out the best options for employers in dealing with settlements for their employees. He founded the Jeremy L. & Associates legal firm; a legal entity that has been involved in some of the most significant commercial mergers and deals in the USA. Learn more: https://www.crunchbase.com/person/jeremy-goldstein#/entity

 

OSI Group President David Mcdonald

David McDonald Is A Man Of Successes

Education and work

David McDonald received his Bachelors in Animal Science from Iowa State University in 1987. McDonald spent 30 years working hard and rising through the ranks of OSI Group. David McDonald is now the President and Chief Operating Officer of OSI Group. The OSI Group is a food service supplier worldwide. One of the many highlights of McDonald’s career was when OSI Group in conjunction with OSI China delivered over 100 tons of food products to Bejing during the 2008 Olympics and the company did not receive a single complaint, and http://www.fooddrink-magazine.com/sections/producers/1308-osi-group.

 

Responsible and sustainable

McDonald understands that being responsible and sustainable means making changes or creating solutions on your own. His company is open to change and takes the time to understand what consumers what. Under the leadership of McDonald, OSI Group is meeting those challenges and is making changes to be as sustainable as possible. OSI has sponsored many initiatives, training sessions, and workshops to educate and promote awareness regarding animal welfare. In 2015, the North America OSI Group donated more than 252,000 pounds of food to Feeding America which is an organization that distributes foods to food banks. More than 55,000 pounds of food was donated to feed children living in the Philippines. All OSI facilities in Europe have been awarded the highest standard of environmental management. It does not stop there, however. The company has many sustainable goals that it would like to achieve. This includes achieving a 10 percent reduction in energy and water by 2020, and his Linkedin.

 

Expanding

McDonald and the OSI Group have the desire to continue to grow. This desire has led to continuing their expansion into the European market. To help with this expansion, OSI acquired Baho Foods. They are a privately owned company that manufactures meat and other goods and then sells them to food businesses located in many places throughout Europe. This will enable OSI Group to have more of a presence in the European market, and read full article.